![]() It's a film that has aged well if that's the case. And why one person who uploaded this film onto YouTube also labelled it as a "sexy nudist film". In today's times, people like this movie BECAUSE it's BDSM-inducing, which is why it's uploaded onto pornography websites, too. Clearly, though, this was intended for audiences who wanted to view a nudist lifestyle for what it is, and not as a way to get themselves sexually active and increase their chances of success in a BDSM-inducing moment (although we don't exactly know what the target nor actual audience was for this film since it's so obscure (of course, people are still purchasing and downloading this film since it's being continuously exhibited and reviewed in the 2010s and quite possibly the 2020s)). That kind of courage is somewhat admirable and lovely. Because the selection of actors here seemed more iconic than most at the time, they were hired for the job - the job to LITERALLY remove all of their clothes around people they most likely have no familial relation to, not get TOO titillated by the opposite gender being naked in front of them as they still have to exposition the story and expidite the scene itself (although the models used here in particular are especially titillating), and to do what they would normally do if they WERE wearing clothes, paying no attention to the undressed specimen surrounding. People in nudist films agree to take off their clothes, from the accessories all the way down to the undergarments. This is clearly a unique nudist film by structure and presentation: the actors have more noticeably tanned bodies the females seem more busty, clean, and reflective than the females in other nudist films from the same period the censorship is ENTIRELY based on the careful positioning of the actor, or whether they're holding an object that they can place in front of their more controversial area (blurring in editing isn't included anywhere) the characters do have a passionate, visibly forced Stepford smile of embarrassment, which the actors actually try to hide in other nudist films the protagonist, Stacy Taylor, shows visible signs of resenting being undressed herself around other actors and, finally, the nudists are presented in a documentative form in-between the scenes that preserve the story more frequently than other nudist films. Additionally, each cast member here makes it obvious that they find it a privilege to be in the presence of another actor's beautiful (feminine) body while also hiding their shame for being around a number of people who are undressed directly in their vision. The intentions of this film are clearly innocuous to the intended audience, what with the frequent censoring of the lower area of the body but not the upper area (breasts are supposed to be censored according to our culture). This review will less highlight the film as a story and more as a film presenting the nudists.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |